Imran Khan’s Verdict Amplifies Focus on Pakistani Military’s Political Interference

By A Correspondent
Former prime minister Imran Khan is riding an unprecedented popular support ahead of February 8 ballot despite the court’s controversial verdict.
As the sun dipped below the horizon over Islamabad, casting long shadows across the city, a somber atmosphere gripped the nation. The news had just broken—Imran Khan, the charismatic and most-revered leader, had been sentenced to 10 years in prison in a phony case through an unprecedentedly flawed judicial process.

The courtroom, typically a place of solemnity, was now charged with an air of disbelief. Imran Khan, the cricketing legend turned politician, stood stoically as the judge Abual Hasnat Zulqarnain delivered the verdict in the so-called cypher case under the Official Secrets Act. The courtroom erupted in whispers, as supporters and critics alike exchanged glances of shock while Khan and  Qureshi exchanged smiles as if they already expected it. Khan faces over 200 trumped up charges, ranging from corruption, terrorism, and breaking numerous laws during his tenure as the country’s prime minister. The verdict’s timing, coming just nine days before the February 8 elections, has raised new questions about the fairness of the national elections, which are reportedly being heavily influenced by its military.

Numerous accounts of the court verdict, delivered inside Rawalpindi’s Adiala Jail under close watch of Pakistan’s military, were making rounds on social media. “The judge virtually ran away from the temporary court room, the jail’s community hall, after dellvering the verdict,” said one journalist who was in the court room. The verdict is being described as the most controversial in Pakistan’s judicial history, which is known for its lowest legal standards and corruption.

Mirza Moiz Baig, a Karachi-based lawyer, said that the verdict will be remembered for the “extraneous reasons” the trial was conducted in, and raises concerns about the “integrity and impartiality” of the court. The question of court’s partiality was also raised by The Intercept’s Washington Bureau Chief Ryan Grim during the State Department’s briefing on January 30 when spokesman Matthew Miller avoided to comment on Khan’s sentencing.

For years, Khan had been seen as a symbol of hope, a leader who promised to root out corruption and usher in a new era of transparency. His fall from grace was both unexpected and disheartening for many who had placed their faith in him.

Social media platforms buzzed with the news, the hashtags #ImranKhanTrial and #JudgmentDay trending nationally. In the days that followed, the country grappled with the aftermath of the verdict. Protests erupted in major cities, with Khan’s loyal supporters vehemently denouncing the decision.

International reactions were swift and varied. Some nations expressed concern over the stability of the region. Amidst the chaos, Imran Khan remained resolute. In a brief statement released through his legal team, he maintained his innocence, vowing to appeal the verdict.

The charismatic leader, who once galvanized the masses with promises of change, now found himself at the center of a legal maelstrom, his political future uncertain. As the nation grappled with the repercussions of Imran Khan’s sentencing, one thing became abundantly clear—Pakistan stood at a crossroads, facing a pivotal moment that would shape its political landscape for years to come. The echoes of the courtroom’s judgment reverberated through the corridors of power, leaving a nation in introspection and uncertainty.

Pakistan’s judiciary has been widely condemned for serving as a foot soldier for the country’s berserk generals who have ruthlessly ruled the South Asian nation for more than half of its existence. The New York-based International Human Rights Foundation condemned the court decision.

Jurists in Pakistan expressed confidence that a high court will strike the verdict down because of the visible flaws in its legal standing. Majority of Pakistanis and international commentators  accuse  the military of orchestrating the country’s destabilizing political drama.

Commentators inside and outside Pakistan agree that even if Nawaz Sharif, who was convicted for money laundering, is installed through electoral rigging by the generals, it will not bring political stability to Pakistan, something Pakistan’s tanked economy needs.

Khan, according to his Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf party, has called on his supporters to stay calm and actively participate in the February 8 verdict. “The real verdict on the case of #ImranKhan versus the ‘Deep State’ will be on Feb 8. On Election Day,” said Dr. Muhammad al-Hachimi al-Hamidi, Author, and Chairman of Almustakillah TV, a London-based Arabic TV channel, on X (formerly Twitter).


Latest news

Related news


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.